Goto

Collaborating Authors

 laplacian matrix


Supplementary Materials: Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Deep Regression with Ordinal Rankings from Spectral Seriation

Neural Information Processing Systems

The main result is presented in Theorem 2. According to the definition of the Fiedler vector, we have ( L + L)( f + f) = ( λ + λ)( f + f). We outline the proof below for interested readers. The main result is presented in Theorem 2. We first present Stewart's theorem in Lemma 1 to assist Actual times may differ depending on hardware and environment. We also show the number of model parameters required for each method in Table S3. Hyper-parameters were selected based on a coarse search on the validation set.





Structured Graph Learning Via Laplacian Spectral Constraints

Sandeep Kumar, Jiaxi Ying, Jose Vinicius de Miranda Cardoso, Daniel Palomar

Neural Information Processing Systems

Learning a graph with a specific structure is essential for interpretability and identification of the relationships among data. It is well known that structured graph learning from observedsamples isanNP-hard combinatorial problem. In this paper, we first show that for a set of important graph families it is possible toconvertthestructural constraints ofstructure intoeigenvalueconstraints ofthe graph Laplacianmatrix.






InterpretableLightweightTransformerviaUnrolling ofLearnedGraphSmoothnessPriors

Neural Information Processing Systems

Orthogonally, algorithm unrolling[14] implements iterations of a model-based algorithm as a sequence of neural layers to build afeed-forward network, whose parameters can be learned endto-end via back-propagation from data. A classic example is the unrolling of theiterative soft-1While works existtoanalyze existing transformer architectures [5,6,7,8,9],only [10,11]characterized the performance ofasingle self-attention layer and ashallowtransformer,respectively.